PART THREE - Analysis & CommentaryIt appears to me that a
basic question has been forgotten by History ...
What was the Peach Tin a prototype for? What was its purpose?
At no stage do I believe the Peach Tin was a prototype for a lawnmower!
As Mason said, in its present skeletal form, the mower was potentially
dangerous.
Mason recognises that Merv saw this too; but at no stage does Mason
ask the basic question - what was the Peach Tin in tended to prove!
The Peach Tin was
not a prototype lawnmower, but a prototype for Merv's
manifolding of the horizontal shaft Villiers engine he had been using on his
Victa 14 reel lawnmower.
I have every reason to believe that Merv had cast a manifold to convert his
Villiers to a vertical shaft configuration. The Peach Tin was a prototype
for engine development. It was a
proof-of-concept prototype for the motor =
with Merv's muffler and manifold designs.
Note that the intake manifold sat towards the ground, and that the sparking
plug did likewise. This design appeared on the first production lawnmower -
the
Billy Cart of late 1952. It wasn't a great idea, and the next models -
the Fan Mowers - would correct this.
Something needs to be said about other
anomalies in Mason's recount of the
Peach Tin. The most obvious is the 'business end' of the prototype...
Here he attached a flat steel bar sharpened on the leading edges and fixed
by a heavy nut and washer to the lower end of the crankshaft.It's pretty clear that this is
not how the
Powerhouse Museum has recorded
the prototype. It has swing-back blades! Does this mean Mason was wrong?
Not necessarily. Prototypes, by definition, are the workhorses of design.
They are not static, but may change as the design is improved.
It is very possible that Merv first used a primitive sharpened blade as used
in many North American designs, but changed this as the design developed.
Who knows?
I do know Merv
did not invent the swing-back blade design, but he was one
of the first users of it.
There is
inconsistency in the Powerhouse image record of the Peach Tin.
Note how some images have been reversed, showing the muffler and carby
on different sides. Not that professional a record it would appear ...
I guess something should be said about the 'peach tin' - a metaphor that
has been adopted to describe the Victa rotary prototype.
The Powerhouse images don't show a peach tin at all. I wouldn't think peaches
would be poured through such a small can lid! It may be, like the blade holder
issue, that Merv did originally use a jury-rig peach tin. But that is not what
I see in the Powerhouse images.
The first production Victa rotary - the
Billy Cart - did take some of its
design from the Peach Tin. The engine configuration, muffler, wheels, flat steel
handle bar (pre-tubular) and swing-back blades, all seem to have been taken from
Merv's original experiments in rotary design with the
Peach Tin.
The rest is history.-----------------------------------
Jack