|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Picked this up from an oldwares store yesterday, has a villiers mk10 engine, not sure if this is the correct engine. Any help correctly identifying would be appreciated. ![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2017/05/full-11400-34470-img_1865.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2017/05/full-11400-34471-img_1864.jpg)
Last edited by CyberJack; 25/05/17 07:27 AM. Reason: Topic Heading.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,938 Likes: 303
Forum Historian
|
Hello LorenzWelcome to these great forums. This is a Whirlwind Rotary Scythe. This one does not appear to be self-propelled - meaning it's probably 20" or 24". I would think the engine is original. I note the PTO side is on the RH side on your machine. That is entirely possible given these were sold over a longer period of time - 1950s and 1960s. Front wheels are not original. Hope this helps.----------------------- Jack ![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2017/05/full-7392-34473-1960_harris_scarfe_15.jpg)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,675 Likes: 165
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
|
Those front wheels are off a pram!!
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Thanks for the information, these forums are great recently been in the process of restoring a victa 18 and have found lots of useful info.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Also the reason I thought the motor isn't correct is it's holes don't line up with the base, maybe it's missing an adapter plate or something ? Not a big issue I'll make up my own plate to get engine to fit correctly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,675 Likes: 165
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
|
Hope you find better front wheels. They don't strike me as adequate.
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Will definitely get some different wheels on the front can't wait to get it going and have a go at using it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,938 Likes: 303
Forum Historian
|
Also the reason I thought the motor isn't correct is it's holes don't line up with the base, maybe it's missing an adapter plate or something ? Hello Lorenz and MowerfreakI wish I knew the answer to that ... There is evidence of a plate to mount the engine ... It appears that it was designed to keep correct belt angles. I have never seen a Whirlwind with a RH PTO. Any ideas welcome. Hope this helps.--------------------------- Jack
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Thanks Jack
Worked out why the PTO is on the other side someone has sat the engine on the wrong way. I'll make up an adapter plate to achieve similar angle for the belt as above. Did a little work on the engine today too try and get her running. Cleaned all the ignition system up, set the timing and are now getting a nice strong blue spark. Also cleaned the carby it was in good condition just needed a tidy up. Got it turning over with a drill gives puffs of smoke out of the exhaust but won't fire up. Doesn't seem to have a whole lot of compression when turning it over. Any idea what is common to cause low compression on these? Will have another go at getting it running tomorrow if not I'll need to strip it down and see what the issue is.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,938 Likes: 303
Forum Historian
|
Hello LorenzThat is funny - but understandable. I think you have solved it. The original adaptor plate appears to have been cast. But who knows? Perhaps it was two steel plates welded together to get height and angle. I guess the ideal centre-line would be between the crankshaft and the centre of the drive pulley. Here is another photo to assist:- Hope this helps.--------------------- Jack
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Thanks for the extra photo will be helpful when I make an adapter plate. Got the old villiers engine fired up runs well now has plenty of compression and starts first time everytime. What material is the cutting disc on tte slasher you've been posting photos of? Mine has an alloy plate was wondering if it is original or not?? ![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2017/05/full-11400-34512-img_1890.jpg)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,938 Likes: 303
Forum Historian
|
Hello Lorenz It is highly unlikely the blade holder is original. I have not found an 'original' machine that did not have rigid 'sickle' blades. The early set-up was bar holder with rigid triangular blades. There was no need for swing-back blades, given shock protection was afforded via the belt drive. As in ... ![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2017/05/full-7392-34514-2013_04_whirlwind_07.jpg) But nothing is certain here - we don't know how the Whirlwind slasher developed over its production life. You are helping us out. Please keep us informed of progress. Cheers ------------------- Jackp.s. That's an interesting last image - with the Stilson 'fish' exploring the workshop ocean floor.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,842 Likes: 14
Moderator
|
G'day folks, Interesting older machine you have there, Lorenz.
As CyberJack has said, that blade plate setup has been cobbled up by a 'previous tenant'.
The Whirlwind slashers all used sickle bar hay mower 'knife segments' for cutting blades AFAIK; the later models went to a triangular blade plate, with three knife segments bolted to the vertices - as mentioned in those ads Jack has posted.
My family's OPE business was a Whirlwind dealership in the 1970's, up until they were bought out by Masport NZ in around 1975. We used to get a few of these older slashers in for repair; they were a very durable and well built machine.
Cheers, Gadge
"ODK Mods can explain it to you, but they can't understand it for you..."
"Crazy can be medicated, ignorance can be educated - but there is no cure for stupid..."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 8,063 Likes: 205
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
|
I love the mudguards real 60's styling and they look like they may be alloy. You would never see that these days
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,675 Likes: 165
SENIOR TECHNICIAN
|
Would these be superior to the Victa Super 24? Sounds that way.
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,842 Likes: 14
Moderator
|
Would these be superior to the Victa Super 24? Sounds that way. For slashing rough stuff, like blackberries and bracken, the old Whirlwinds were pretty hard to beat. Pretty much on par performance-wise with Mobilco's Heavycut slasher, but the Mobilco had the advantage of being self-propelled.
Cheers, Gadge
"ODK Mods can explain it to you, but they can't understand it for you..."
"Crazy can be medicated, ignorance can be educated - but there is no cure for stupid..."
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 42 Likes: 2
Novice
|
Thanks for all the extra info, i love things from this era I will keep updating the process I need to finish my current victa 18 project before I put all my efforts into the whirlwind. At this stage I'm thinking I'm going to keep the rustic aged look and make it all work correctly and safe. Will put it to use slashing some of my block.
Jack just another question I'm assuming the diameter of the cutting blades is 20" ? Just so I know when I fabricate a cutter for mine.
Thanks for all the great advice so far
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,938 Likes: 303
Forum Historian
|
Hi LorenzYes, this is a story many folks will follow. I'm assuming the diameter of the cutting blades is 20" ? Just so I know when I fabricate a cutter for mine. These machines were made in 20" and 24". The 26" machines were self-propelled. The diameter will be the tip-to-tip measurement. If you fabricate a bar holder, the tip-to-tip will include the blades, as in the image above. The stepped down bar holder was designed to protect wear on the holder bolt heads. Hope this helps.---------------------- JackTriangular blades are still available. However, I'm not sure whether the original holder on your machine was a steel triangular job, with same triangular blades. I see no problem with fabricating a bar holder for swing-back blades of your choice - if you would prefer that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,842 Likes: 14
Moderator
|
As CyberJack has said, you could go with swing-back blades, but that would be a bit self-defeating, I'd think. After all, this thing is a slasher for hacking into weeds and rough stuff, not a lawnmower! So either a one-piece bar blade, as the Mobilco Heavycut had, or a replica of the triangular plate/knife segment design used by Whirlwind would be the go. The 'knife sections' are available, as grain headers all use the sickle bar cutter system. This mob have a large range of bar blades, if you should decide to go that way. http://www.asproducts.com.au/index.phpNew Heavycut blades are available from http://www.heavycut.com.au/SpareParts.htmI can't recall offhand, what the exact cut width of the Heavycut machines is, but Heavycut Spares will know.
Cheers, Gadge
"ODK Mods can explain it to you, but they can't understand it for you..."
"Crazy can be medicated, ignorance can be educated - but there is no cure for stupid..."
|
|
|
These Outdoorking Forums have helped Thousands of people in finding answers to their equipment questions.
If you have received help, please consider making a donation to support the on-going running cost of these forums.
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums145
Topics12,992
Posts106,835
Members17,577
|
Most Online14,275 Yesterday at 08:44 PM
|
|
|
|