PART TWO - SpecificationThe difference between the
Mowmatic and
Mowmanual was in self-propulsion.
The more popular Mowmatic featured Cox's patented
'Live Drive' -
a combination of an engine drive friction cone acting against clutch plates,
with a final 'dog drive' to the solid rubber wheels (unlike the Rover).
This would have given clutch-less
forward and reverse.
The
Mowmanual is a bit mysterious; in that it would have been pedestrian
pushed - without the unique Cox drive transmission. I have not seen one of
these.
In this rare, early brochure we see the difference between the
Mowmatic and
Mowmanual. Also of note is that
John Deck & Sons were the
NSW distributors of Cox mowers - later to become manufacturers in their
own right.
![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2016/09/full-7392-30267-2014_09_ebay_c1960s.jpg)
Powered by
Briggs & Stratton engines, this machine had a wide
26" cutting width,
an inch larger than its Queensland competitor,
Rover's HD25, a 25" machine
(originally, the 'Rider').
Originally the Cox machines had a
6hp Briggs, but this would be increased in
subsequent years. Of particular interest is the clear statement that the
Mowmatic was manufactured
after the first Cox lawnmower, the
Mowmobile.
It shared the same transmission and wheels though...
![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2016/09/full-7392-30268-2014_09_ebay_c1960s_02.jpg)
A later,
1970s brochure (from my collection) shows that the
Mowmatic and
Mowmanual were in production for some time. I love the slogan,
"Ask the man who owns one",
borrowed from a famous American Automobile manufacturer. How quaint!
TO BE CONTINUED...