I recently found a Victa utility base in good condition with the big petrol tank. I notice the outer edge bolt hole on the left side is recessed rather than level with the others. Is a spacer required when moving a Powertorque over from a rear catcher model?
I had to fit spacers when moving a full crank motor from a Mayfair base onto a ute.
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
I agree the Power Torque on a Utility base only needs the 3 centre bolts ,I have a few that are not drilled for the forth hole but never seen 4 bolts used with the utes ,
The long answer would come down to Metal Strength and Stiffness ,If sheet metal is flat it bends easily, to increase the structural strength the base is pressed into a shape that increases strength without using thicker materials.
Looking at the Power Torque rear discharge metal base the top engine mounting position on the base is fairly flat so having the 4th hole will increase the rigidity of the top surface of the base but looking at the Utility base it has a lot more pressings into it's top engine mounting surface so does not need the 4th bolt for added support .
I would say the power torque engine creates more torque at a higher RPM, while a 4-stroke engine creates a higher torque at a lower RPM also the Power Torque being a half crank motor is not as well balanced as a full crank motor ,these contributing factors would be why the Power Torque needs the 4 bolts on the rear discharge base.
The Masport base below looks a better shape around the engine mounts than the Victa rear discharge for strength and stiffness.